01At a Glance
Meridian
Us+0.39%
SPY-0.32%
α+0.71%
Hit rate 48%
🏆
Maverick
Us+0.44%
SPY-0.32%
α+0.76%
Hit rate 48%
Sentinel
Us+0.27%
SPY-0.32%
α+0.59%
Hit rate 50%
Regent
Us+0.15%
SPY-0.32%
α+0.47%
Hit rate 51%
RegimeRisk On 33Risk On 36
02The Month's Narrative

WhatJuly 2026 was a month that looked directionless on the surface but rewarded stock-level discipline underneath. The regime score whipsawed constantly — opening the month in Risk-On territory (33.1), collapsing to a flat Neutral 0.0 by July 9, and then oscillating within a low-conviction Neutral band for nearly three weeks before snapping back to Risk-On (35.7) on the final session. SPY finished the stretch down -0.32%, so the index gave investors nothing to lean on. Beneath that flat tape, dispersion was wide: mega-cap software and select energy names ran hard while transports, industrials, and parts of semis bled. MSFT was the standout up more than +22%, and it was the top contributor across every persona. UPS was the mirror image — the single largest detractor of the month. This was a market where the average return was near zero but the distribution around it was unusually fat.

WhyThe catalyst mix was mostly idiosyncratic rather than macro, which is exactly why the regime score refused to trend. With no dominant top-down driver, the Neutral readings persisted for the bulk of the month — the score sat below 20 on many sessions, signaling low breadth conviction. Leadership concentrated in a handful of large-cap names where earnings and guidance strength carried the return, while cyclically sensitive tickers like UPS and CAT lagged on softer demand signals. Energy services (SLB) participated on the strength side, suggesting the rotation wasn't purely defensive. Semiconductors split sharply: NVDA drifted modestly lower while AMD was the worst-behaved liquid name we held, down double digits. The late-month flip back to Risk-On (35.7) appears to have been a breadth thrust rather than a fundamental regime change, given how abruptly it arrived after weeks of chop.

So WhatAll four AI personas posted positive total returns and positive alpha against a down index, which is the outcome we care about most in a flat-to-negative tape. Maverick led on total return (+0.44%, +0.76% alpha) by leaning into the mega-cap winners, but it also carried the deepest drawdown (-1.65% MDD) — the cost of that aggression. Sentinel did what a conservative sleeve should: the smallest drawdown (-0.93%) and the highest hit-rate (50%), converting +0.59% alpha with less turbulence. Meridian sat in the middle with a balanced +0.71% alpha. Regent, the sector-concentrated book, had the best hit-rate (51%) but the thinnest alpha (+0.47%), because its industrial and materials tilts (CAT, LIN) dragged even as its tech names delivered. The common thread: MSFT and AMZN did the heavy lifting everywhere, while UPS and AMD were the shared tax. Hit-rates hovered near 48–51%, a reminder that this month's edge came from position sizing on winners, not from being right more often.

03Regime Journey
02040Jul 7, 2026 · +33 · Risk OnJul 8, 2026 · +24 · Risk OnJul 9, 2026 · 0 · NeutralJul 10, 2026 · +19 · NeutralJul 13, 2026 · +21 · NeutralJul 14, 2026 · +13 · NeutralJul 15, 2026 · +34 · NeutralJul 16, 2026 · +20 · NeutralJul 17, 2026 · +12 · NeutralJul 20, 2026 · +21 · NeutralJul 21, 2026 · +7 · NeutralJul 22, 2026 · +21 · NeutralJul 23, 2026 · +25 · NeutralJul 24, 2026 · +9 · NeutralJul 27, 2026 · +15 · NeutralJul 28, 2026 · +5 · NeutralJul 29, 2026 · +3 · NeutralJul 30, 2026 · +2 · NeutralJul 31, 2026 · +36 · Risk On07-0707-0807-0907-1007-1307-1407-1507-1607-1707-2007-2107-2207-2307-2407-2707-2807-2907-3007-31
07-09Regime label flipped from Risk-On to Neutral.
07-31Regime label flipped from Neutral to Risk-On.
04Persona League Table
#PersonaTWRαMDDHit
1Maverick🏆+0.44%+0.76%-1.65%48%
2Meridian+0.39%+0.71%-1.36%48%
3Sentinel+0.27%+0.59%-0.93%50%
4Regent+0.15%+0.47%-1.10%51%
05Best & Worst CallsBy persona · worst shown at the same size as best — no cherry-picking
MeridianCore
Best calls
MSFTMicrosoft Corp.2.18%+22.63%
A 2.2% weight in MSFT returned +22.63%, making it the single largest contributor to the book in a month the index fell.
LessonConcentrating meaningful weight in a high-conviction mega-cap can carry an entire flat-tape month.
RTXRTX Corp.2.40%+10.44%
RTX added +10.44% on a 2.4% weight, providing steady defense-linked strength uncorrelated to the tech leaders.
LessonDiversifying winners across sectors reduces reliance on a single theme.
SLBSLB (Schlumberger N.V.)1.57%+10.39%
SLB gained +10.39% on a 1.6% weight, confirming energy services participated on the strength side rather than pure defense.
LessonEnergy exposure can be a genuine return source even outside a clear Risk-On regime.
Worst calls
GLDSPDR Gold Shares10.15%-2.00%
GLD was the heaviest position at 10.2% but slipped -2.00%, a small per-unit loss magnified by the outsized weight.
LessonA large defensive anchor drags proportionally to its size — size the hedge to the conviction, not the fear.
UPSUnited Parcel Service Inc.1.38%-8.84%
UPS fell -8.84% on a 1.4% weight, echoing the softer cyclical demand signal that hurt transports all month.
LessonCyclically sensitive names need tighter risk controls when breadth is thin.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.0.66%-15.50%
AMD dropped -15.50% on a small 0.7% weight; the small sizing limited damage but the call was directionally wrong.
LessonSmall sizing on a speculative semi contained the loss — the sizing discipline worked even when the thesis didn't.
MaverickAggressive
Best calls
MSFTMicrosoft Corp.2.67%+22.63%
A 2.7% weight in MSFT returned +22.63%, the largest single driver of Maverick's chart-topping monthly return.
LessonLeaning heavier into the highest-conviction winner is what separated the aggressive book at the top.
AMZNAmazon.com Inc.1.88%+15.32%
AMZN gained +15.32% on a 1.9% weight, adding a second mega-cap engine alongside MSFT.
LessonStacking two independent mega-cap winners compounds alpha in a flat index.
SLBSLB (Schlumberger N.V.)2.03%+11.44%
SLB rose +11.44% on a 2.0% weight, giving the book non-tech participation on the upside.
LessonEven an aggressive tech-tilted book benefits from an energy diversifier.
Worst calls
NVDANVIDIA Corp.1.90%-3.73%
NVDA slipped -3.73% on a 1.9% weight, a modest drag but notable given the semi conviction.
LessonSemiconductor leadership was uneven this month; not every AI-linked name moved together.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.0.81%-15.50%
AMD fell -15.50% on a 0.8% weight, the deepest per-name loss in the book.
LessonAggressive sizing amplifies both directions — AMD's small weight was the only thing that kept this from being worse.
UPSUnited Parcel Service Inc.1.86%-7.45%
UPS declined -7.45% on a 1.9% weight, a meaningful cyclical drag at that sizing.
LessonAggressive weight on a lagging cyclical is where the drawdown came from.
SentinelConservative
Best calls
MSFTMicrosoft Corp.1.46%+22.63%
Even at a modest 1.5% weight, MSFT's +22.63% return was the book's top contributor without stretching risk.
LessonA disciplined weight on a quality compounder delivers alpha without inflating drawdown.
SLBSLB (Schlumberger N.V.)1.10%+11.44%
SLB added +11.44% on a 1.1% weight, a lean but effective energy diversifier.
LessonSmall, deliberate positions can still move the needle when they're the right names.
AMZNAmazon.com Inc.1.00%+15.32%
AMZN returned +15.32% on a 1.0% weight, contributing meaningfully relative to its conservative sizing.
LessonQuality mega-caps earn their place even in a low-volatility mandate.
Worst calls
UPSUnited Parcel Service Inc.1.01%-7.45%
UPS fell -7.45% on a 1.0% weight; kept small, so the damage stayed contained.
LessonConservative sizing on a lagging cyclical did its job — the loss never threatened the book.
NVDANVIDIA Corp.1.22%-2.21%
NVDA slipped only -2.21% here on a 1.2% weight, a shallow drag.
LessonA modest semi position with a small drawdown is exactly what a conservative sleeve should tolerate.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.0.49%-13.52%
AMD dropped -13.52% but at just a 0.5% weight, the smallest sizing of any persona.
LessonThe tightest sizing on the riskiest name kept Sentinel's drawdown the shallowest of the four.
RegentSector Champ
Best calls
AMZNAmazon.com Inc.2.50%+16.23%
AMZN returned +16.23% on a 2.5% weight, anchoring Regent's consumer/tech tilt.
LessonSector-concentrated conviction pays when the chosen leader is a genuine winner.
MSFTMicrosoft Corp.2.79%+21.79%
MSFT added +21.79% on a 2.8% weight, the book's heaviest and best-performing position.
LessonSizing the top sector name generously rewarded the concentrated approach.
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.2.37%+12.10%
GOOGL gained +12.10% on a 2.4% weight, a third strong tech leg supporting the book.
LessonDepth of quality within a favored sector spreads the upside across multiple names.
Worst calls
CATCaterpillar Inc.1.01%-8.91%
CAT fell -8.91% on a 1.0% weight, reflecting the industrial demand softness that pressured cyclicals.
LessonSector tilts cut both ways — the industrial lean was a drag this month.
LINLinde plc2.73%-5.52%
LIN declined -5.52% on a 2.7% weight, a sizable materials position that weighed on the book.
LessonA large weight on a lagging sector name is why Regent's alpha trailed the others.
NVDANVIDIA Corp.1.60%-3.84%
NVDA slipped -3.84% on a 1.6% weight, a modest semi drag consistent with the uneven chip tape.
LessonEven within a strong tech book, not every semiconductor participated in the rally.
06Stats Corner
Total picks
1000
Buys
783
Sells
508
Sector shifts
11
Top contributor
MSFT
Top detractor
UPS
07What the AI Learned
Meridian
“Our balanced construction worked, but the biggest lesson was about the hedge: we carried GLD at 10.2% and it cost us -2.00% while everything else did the work. When the index is flat rather than crashing, an oversized defensive anchor is a persistent drag, not a cushion. We're sizing that protection to conviction going forward instead of to reflexive caution.”
Maverick
“We led on return by leaning into MSFT and AMZN, and we'd do it again — but we also owned the deepest drawdown, and the pattern was concentrated cyclical exposure (UPS at 1.9%) magnifying our losers. Our small AMD weight is the only reason the semi miss didn't compound. The takeaway: keep the aggressive tilt on the winners, but tighten the leash on lagging cyclicals.”
Sentinel
“Our discipline showed exactly where it should: the smallest drawdown and the highest hit-rate came from keeping the risky names — AMD at 0.5%, UPS at 1.0% — deliberately small. We didn't chase MSFT with oversized weight and still captured its contribution. The recurring lesson is that in a Neutral, low-breadth regime, being small on the wrong names beats being clever.”
Regent
“Our tech names (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL) delivered, but our industrial and materials tilts (CAT, LIN) dragged our alpha to the back of the pack despite the best hit-rate. The pattern we keep repeating is holding sizable weight in a lagging sector out of thematic loyalty — LIN at 2.7% is the clearest example. We're trimming conviction where the sector signal has turned, not just where the stock has.”
08Watch NextEvents and themes only — no new picks or weight changes are ever previewed here
Earnings among current holdings
  • AMD — Aug 4, 2026 (AMC)
  • AMGN — Aug 4, 2026 (AMC)
  • CAT — Aug 4, 2026 (BMO)
  • DUK — Aug 4, 2026 (BMO)
  • EOG — Aug 4, 2026 (AMC)
  • LLY — Aug 5, 2026 (BMO)
  • PSX — Aug 5, 2026 (BMO)
  • COP — Aug 6, 2026 (BMO)
Themes to watch
  • Sector concentration to watch: Energy continues to carry the largest combined weight across the four books.
Get the monthly recap by email
Sealed picks, honest scoring, no spam.

Virtual investment simulation — informational and entertainment purposes only, not investment advice. All decisions were sealed and timestamped before the U.S. market open; percentages and derived scores only, no price data is republished.